Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit e7be3be2 authored by Gerhard Gonter's avatar Gerhard Gonter :speech_balloon:
Browse files

new OJS DOI requests for ASEAS, see #23786

parent bc976896
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing
with 310 additions and 0 deletions
identifiers.tsv
+ 7
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
id na_id identifier context_id context_pid canonical_url ticket ts_md_fetch ts_dcd_registration
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0036 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/3909 23547 2020-10-20T121120Z 2020-10-20T121803Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0037 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/4295 23572 2020-11-06T033958Z 2020-11-06T034132Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0038 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/3462 23786 2021-01-06T023330Z 2021-01-06T023639Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0039 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/5081 23628 2020-11-23T210421Z 2020-11-23T210438Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0040 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/3771 23786 2021-01-06T023421Z 2021-01-06T023639Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0041 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/3490 23786 2021-01-06T023441Z 2021-01-06T023639Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0042 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/3602 23786 2021-01-06T023251Z 2021-01-06T023639Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0043 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/5284 23786 2021-01-06T023605Z 2021-01-06T023639Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0044 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/5369 23786 2021-01-06T023057Z 2021-01-06T023639Z
3 10.14764/10.ASEAS-0045 1 https://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/3487 23786 2021-01-06T023526Z 2021-01-06T023639Z
metadata/10.ASEAS/10.ASEAS-0038.xml 0 → 100644
+ 37
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14764/10.ASEAS-0038</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Bärnthaler, Richard</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Conflict, Controversy, Compromise, and Compression: The Pragmatics of Transdisciplinary (Development) Projects</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies</publisher>
<publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Submitted">2020-03-04</date>
<date dateType="Accepted">2020-05-14</date>
<date dateType="Updated">2020-12-31</date>
<date dateType="Issued">2020-12-08</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">14-404-3462</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<sizes>
<size>193-210 Pages</size>
</sizes>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">
Drawing upon qualitative interviews, this article narrates central controversies and conflicts that scholars working in the field of “development” face in their daily work. Based on how these conflicts and controversies have been reconstructed, I place them in the discourse on transdisciplinarity, drawing into question the claim to authority and novelty around the term “transdisciplinarity” that Western institutions have attributed themselves with in recent years. Finally, I turn to the question of collaboration: How can transdisciplinary projects deal with the fact of pluralism on the one hand and the necessity to work towards shared problem definitions, solutions, and strategies on the other? In this context, I make a case against transdisciplinarity’s often-held conceptions of harmony, comprehensiveness and total systems as well as unity and for compromise, partiality and joint contextual strategies. The “art of deliberation”, thus, replaces the notion of transcendence as a central competence of transdisciplinary scholars.
</description>
<description descriptionType="SeriesInformation">Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Negotiating Transdisciplinarity</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
metadata/10.ASEAS/10.ASEAS-0040.xml 0 → 100644
+ 48
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14764/10.ASEAS-0040</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Heis, Alexandra</creatorName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Vaddhanaphuti, Chayan</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Thai Baan Methodology and Transdisciplinarity as Collaborative Research Practices: Common Ground and Divergent Directions</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies</publisher>
<publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Submitted">2020-06-10</date>
<date dateType="Accepted">2020-10-29</date>
<date dateType="Updated">2020-12-31</date>
<date dateType="Issued">2020-12-31</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">14-404-3771</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<sizes>
<size>211-228 Pages</size>
</sizes>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
Thai Baan research was developed in the late 1990s as a counter-hegemonic, emancipatory means of knowledge production. Originally developed in the context of protests against a hydropower project, it aims at empowering socially and economically marginalized actors to create and represent their own knowledge and to regain authority in social struggles. This decolonial methodology, conceptualized by Thai academics in collaboration with non-academic actors, has remained largely unnoticed by Northern collaborative or transdisciplinary debates. Transdisciplinary research, although engaged in collaborative research designs, often remains silent on issues of power imbalances as constitutive of research processes. Criticizing the compartmentalization and limitation of academic knowledge production, transdisciplinarity realigns the scientific system of knowledge production to deal with ‘real-world problems’. During the last three decades, transdisciplinarity has unfolded into a collaborative and integrative methodology implemented in a number of fields, such as sustainability, public health, and development planning. This article systematically introduces Thai Baan and transdisciplinarity as two approaches to collaborative research practice. It introduces the context of their emergence, sheds light on the respective notions of knowledge and science, and discusses their respective methodological designs. It is argued that both would benefit from a stronger epistemological foundation in decolonizing, liberating philosophies of science to enhance collaborative action, overcome North-South divisions, and foster global dialogues in emancipatory knowledge production.
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
</description>
<description descriptionType="SeriesInformation">Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Negotiating Transdisciplinarity</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
metadata/10.ASEAS/10.ASEAS-0041.xml 0 → 100644
+ 45
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14764/10.ASEAS-0041</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Doi, Nguyen Minh</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Institutional Prospects and Challenges to Transdisciplinary Approach in the Knowledge Production System of Vietnam</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies</publisher>
<publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Submitted">2020-03-27</date>
<date dateType="Accepted">2020-10-19</date>
<date dateType="Updated">2020-12-31</date>
<date dateType="Issued">2020-12-31</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">14-404-3490</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<sizes>
<size>229-242 Pages</size>
</sizes>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
Drawing on neo-institutionalism in policy studies, this paper aims to demonstrate that transdisciplinarity is a new logic that could challenge the existing institutional logic of the knowledge production system in Vietnam. This institutional interplay is examined by analyzing the institutional response, interactions, and choices of stakeholders participating in an EU Erasmus+ Capacity Building Project. The analysis shows that the transdisciplinarity concept can be used as a potential framework for the develop- ment path of the dominant logic characterized by the shift from a traditional statist to a market-oriented model for knowledge production. Nevertheless, there are challenges like power relations in the interplay processes among actors who try to reproduce existing institutional logic and those who support transdisciplinary logic, as well as regarding relevant decision-makers to make institutional choices. The discussion shows that when applying transdisciplinarity, one should consider the motivation and barriers regarding state control, transdisciplinary readiness, hybrid models, funding, and experience.
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
</description>
<description descriptionType="SeriesInformation">Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Negotiating Transdisciplinarity</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
metadata/10.ASEAS/10.ASEAS-0042.xml 0 → 100644
+ 45
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14764/10.ASEAS-0042</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Dannecker, Petra</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Transdisciplinarity ‘Meets’ Power Structures: Challenges and Experiences of a Capacity Building Project on Transdisciplinarity </title>
</titles>
<publisher>Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies</publisher>
<publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Submitted">2020-04-30</date>
<date dateType="Accepted">2020-09-17</date>
<date dateType="Updated">2020-12-31</date>
<date dateType="Issued">2020-12-31</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">14-404-3602</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<sizes>
<size>175-192 Pages</size>
</sizes>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
The aim of the paper is to discuss and to reflect on the experiences and challenges encountered during the North-South capacity building project on transdisciplinarity, KNOTS (Fostering Multi-Lateral Knowledge Networks of Transdisciplinary Studies to Tackle Global Challenges), which was financed by the EU through the Erasmus+ Capacity Building in Higher Education program. Despite the large body of literature on transdisciplinary approaches and projects, not many studies exist that discuss both the political and the power dimensions within transdisciplinary endeavors, especially not from a social science perspective. Based on the experiences, challenges, and progress over the course of the project, I will analyze how power relations influenced and structured KNOTS. I argue that the success of transdisciplinary North-South collaborations depends very much on awareness of power hierarchies, reflexivity, and positionality as well as different understandings of knowledge. Although differences will be highlighted regarding, for example, the aims of transdisciplinarity or the role of different understandings of science and knowledge, the paper does not aim to increase skepticism regarding transdisciplinarity. Instead, the intent of the reflections is to increase awareness of the influences of power structures and relations in transdisciplinarity projects, especially North-South collaboration projects.
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
</description>
<description descriptionType="SeriesInformation">Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Negotiating Transdisciplinarity</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
metadata/10.ASEAS/10.ASEAS-0043.xml 0 → 100644
+ 40
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14764/10.ASEAS-0043</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Nováková, Barbora</creatorName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Lopatková, Marta</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Ethics and the Role of Humanities in Transdisciplinary Research? A Short Reflection on the KNOTS Project</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies</publisher>
<publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Submitted">2020-12-15</date>
<date dateType="Accepted">2020-12-15</date>
<date dateType="Updated">2020-12-31</date>
<date dateType="Issued">2020-12-31</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">14-404-5284</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<sizes>
<size>261-266 Pages</size>
</sizes>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">
In this paper, we reflect upon our role as researchers embedded in humanities in the KNOTS project. In the course of the project, we noticed various misapprehensions among both staff and students stemming, among others, form different cultural, political, and educational backgrounds. While a diversity of inputs and perspectives is considered an advantage for transdisciplinary projects, cooperation among actors with various backgrounds can also be challenging. Based on our observations and previous experience living and working in Vietnam, we created a session focusing on ethics for the last summer school in Ho Chi Minh City. We decided to bring participants’ attention to research ethics and issues of cross-cultural communication, and suggested reflection and discussion as a coping strategy. In the course of a three years long mutual learning process, we realized that striving to create a common understanding of research ethics and cross-cultural awareness is an indispensable element of teaching and doing transdisciplinary research in a multicultural environment.
</description>
<description descriptionType="SeriesInformation">Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Negotiating Transdisciplinarity</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
metadata/10.ASEAS/10.ASEAS-0044.xml 0 → 100644
+ 40
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14764/10.ASEAS-0044</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Dannecker, Petra</creatorName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Heis, Alexandra</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>‘Transdisciplinarity’: A Framework of Knowledge Production in North-South Partnerships?</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies</publisher>
<publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Submitted">2020-12-28</date>
<date dateType="Accepted">2020-12-28</date>
<date dateType="Updated">2020-12-31</date>
<date dateType="Issued">2020-12-31</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">14-404-5369</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<sizes>
<size>165-174 Pages</size>
</sizes>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">
-
</description>
<description descriptionType="SeriesInformation">Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Negotiating Transdisciplinarity</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
metadata/10.ASEAS/10.ASEAS-0045.xml 0 → 100644
+ 48
− 0
View file @ e7be3be2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14764/10.ASEAS-0045</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Seemann, Frank</creatorName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Antweiler, Christoph</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Linking European and Southeast Asian Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production:</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies</publisher>
<publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Submitted">2020-03-25</date>
<date dateType="Accepted">2020-11-02</date>
<date dateType="Updated">2020-12-31</date>
<date dateType="Issued">2020-12-31</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">14-404-3487</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<sizes>
<size>243-259 Pages</size>
</sizes>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
This article aims to explore knowledge co-production through a critical (and self-critical) reflection of experiences with doing evaluation within the Fostering Multi-Lateral Knowledge Networks of Transdisciplinary Studies to Tackle Global Challenges (KNOTS) project. KNOTS started as a collaborative project to explore the possibilities and increase the expertise of seven institutions from Europe and Southeast Asia in teaching a transdisciplinary approach at their higher education institutions. Planned as a capacity-building tool for higher education, its main objectives were to create a teaching manual and to es- tablish sustainable networks and knowledge hubs in this field of knowledge production. This was to be achieved mainly by means of summer schools and fieldtrips in Southeast Asia, which would enable learning through practical application of the knowledge developed. The realization of this ambitious conceptual formulation turned out to be pretty complex and this holds for the very process of evaluation itself as well. We discuss and illustrate the specific problems of a strict evaluation in such a complex transdisciplinary project. The notorious complexity of interdisciplinary and the more transdisciplinary projects was further increased by the intercultural, respective, transcultural dimension involved. Topics discussed include structurally immanent difficulties, unintended effects of financial and political constraints, complications caused by hierarchies and language, and effects of cultural differences, especially different university science cultures. In the form of lessons learned during the evaluation process, we give some hints for the development and implementation of the transdisciplinary approach as a new tool for reaching socially relevant knowledge, especially in cross-cultural settings.
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
</description>
<description descriptionType="SeriesInformation">Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Negotiating Transdisciplinarity</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment