From f2cb0253ad9e4abc4a53885fb4614f7cc03f0e25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerhard Gonter <ggonter@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:46:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] DOI 10.25365/vlr-2025-9-1-1 registered for OJS vlr, see #37898 --- identifiers.tsv | 1 + metadata/vlr/vlr-2025-9-1-1.xml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+) create mode 100644 metadata/vlr/vlr-2025-9-1-1.xml diff --git a/identifiers.tsv b/identifiers.tsv index a665e6d..c87dde1 100644 --- a/identifiers.tsv +++ b/identifiers.tsv @@ -2262,6 +2262,7 @@ id na_id identifier context_id context_pid canonical_url ticket ts_md_fetch ts_d 1 10.25365/vlr-2024-8-1-155 1 https://viennalawreview.com/index.php/vlr/article/view/8814 35193 2024-06-28T110532Z 2024-06-28T110623Z 1 10.25365/vlr-2024-8-1-179 1 https://viennalawreview.com/index.php/vlr/article/view/9041 36523 2024-10-10T171327Z 2024-10-10T171340Z 1 10.25365/vlr-2024-8-1-209 1 https://viennalawreview.com/index.php/vlr/article/view/9088 36711 2024-11-11T132235Z 2024-11-11T132249Z + 1 10.25365/vlr-2025-9-1-1 1 https://viennalawreview.com/index.php/vlr/article/view/9354 37898 2025-03-18T153717Z 2025-03-18T153748Z 1 10.25365/wbagon-2019-1-1 1 https://wbagon.univie.ac.at/index.php/wbagon/article/view/794 18844 2019-04-04T081747Z 2019-04-04T125527Z 1 10.25365/wbagon-2019-1-2 1 https://wbagon.univie.ac.at/index.php/wbagon/article/view/795 18844 2019-04-04T081746Z 2019-04-04T125527Z 1 10.25365/wbagon-2019-1-3 1 https://wbagon.univie.ac.at/index.php/wbagon/article/view/796 18844 2019-04-04T081745Z 2019-04-04T125527Z diff --git a/metadata/vlr/vlr-2025-9-1-1.xml b/metadata/vlr/vlr-2025-9-1-1.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f07fc02 --- /dev/null +++ b/metadata/vlr/vlr-2025-9-1-1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd"> + <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.25365/vlr-2025-9-1-1</identifier> + <creators> + <creator> + <creatorName>Traußnigg , Martin</creatorName> + </creator> + </creators> + <titles> + <title>Development of Principles in Administrative Procedural Law</title> + <title titleType="TranslatedTitle">Development of Principles in Administrative Procedural Law</title> + </titles> + <publisher>University of Vienna Law Review</publisher> + <publicationYear>2025</publicationYear> + <subjects> + <subject>administrative procedure</subject> + <subject>principle of ex officio inquiry</subject> + <subject>state of facts</subject> + </subjects> + <dates> + <date dateType="Submitted">2025-03-18</date> + <date dateType="Updated">2025-03-18</date> + <date dateType="Issued">2025-03-18</date> + </dates> + <language>en</language> + <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="JournalArticle"/> + <alternateIdentifiers> + <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="publisherId">8-712-9354</alternateIdentifier> + </alternateIdentifiers> + <rightsList> + <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights> + </rightsList> + <descriptions> + <description descriptionType="Abstract"> +This paper addresses one of the determinants of the tense relationship of administration and (administrative) jurisdiction in Austria: the principle of ex officio inquiry and its historical foundations. Characteristically, this principle implies that the investigation of the facts relevant to a case must be conducted by the administrative authority or the administrative court respectively, without them being bound to the pleadings or offers of evidence by the parties to the case. On that note, the principle dominates most administrative proceedings and, at the same time, shall be regarded as a part of the administrative courts’ powers of review – distinguishing them decisively from the civil courts. This paper tries to trace the roots of the relevant provisions of the General Administrative Procedure Act 1991 (Allgemeines Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz 1991 – AVG), which are applicable in proceedings both before the administrative authorities and the courts, focusing on the fact-finding principle of ex officio inquiry. It wants to shed light on the early case law of the Supreme Administrative Court and particularly on how the doctrinal works of Friedrich Tezner on principles of administrative procedure have influenced core sections of the AVG until today. +</description> + </descriptions> + <relatedItems> + <relatedItem relationType="IsPublishedIn" relatedItemType="Journal"> + <relatedItemIdentifier relatedItemIdentifierType="EISSN">2521-3962</relatedItemIdentifier> + <titles> + <title>University of Vienna Law Review</title> + </titles> + <volume>9</volume> + <issue>1</issue> + <firstPage>1</firstPage> + <lastPage>19</lastPage> + </relatedItem> + </relatedItems> +</resource> -- GitLab